DTN IQFeed, DTN.IQ, DTN ProphetX Support Forums

Join the 80,000 other DTN customers who enjoy the fastest, most reliable data available. There is no better value than DTN!

(Move your cursor to this area to pause scrolling)

"If you are serious about your trading I would not rely on IB data for serious daytrading. Took me a while to justify the cost of IQ Feed and in the end, it's just a 2 point stop on ES. Better safe than sorry" - Comment from Public Forum

"Very impressed with the quality of your feed - ******* is a real donkey in comparison." - Comment from A.C. via Email

"Everything is working great with the API. I love it." - Comment from Calvin

"As a past ******* customer(and not a happy one), IQ Feed by DTN is a much better and cheaper product with great customer support. I have had no problems at all since switching over." - Comment from Public Forum

"I have to tell you though that using the IQFeed API is about the easiest and cleanest I have seen for some time." - Comment from Jim

"Thank you so much - awesome feed, awesome service!" - Comment from Greg via Email

"I am a hedge fund manager here. It’s funny, I have a Bloomberg terminal and a Bridge feed, but I still like having my DTN feed!" - Comment from Feras

"Interactive Brokers tick data was inconsistent, so I have switched to using DTN exclusively. It is great to no longer have to worry about my datafeed all day long." - Comment from Philippe

"DTN has never given me problems. It is incredibly stable. In fact I've occasionally lost the data feed from Interactive Brokers, but still been able to trade because I'm getting good data from DTN." - Comment from Leighton

"DTN feed was the only feed that consistently matched Bloomberg feed for BID/ASK data verification work these past years......DTN feed is a must for my supply & demand based trading using Cumulative Delta" - Comment from Public Forum Post

Home

Recent Posts

Information on DTN's Industries:
DTN Oil & Gas | DTN Trading | DTN Agriculture | DTN Weather

DTN.IQ/IQFeed on Twitter
DTN News and Analysis on Twitter

»Forums Index »Archive (2017 and earlier) »Data and Content Support »Again: possible wrong continuous contracts LL# and IE#

Author	Topic: Again: possible wrong continuous contracts LL# and IE# (5 messages, Page 1 of 1)
mvvcorp -Interested User- Posts: 24 Joined: Apr 7, 2010	Posted: Apr 5, 2011 05:49 PM Msg. 1 of 5 Possible wrong continuous contracts LL# and IE#. I've downloaded tick history (4 months) for LL# (continuous ) and LLU11 (single). LL# ~ 2 Mb (ASCII file) LLU11~ 20 Mb (ASCII file) difference - 10 times! It means that continuous contract have less liquidity than single contract (at 10 times!). Obviously something wrong with continuous contract LL# (as it was for QGC#) The same is for IE#
mvvcorp -Interested User- Posts: 24 Joined: Apr 7, 2010	Posted: Apr 5, 2011 06:10 PM Msg. 2 of 5 LG# "lost" ALL(!) liquidity between 28-feb-2011, 28-mar-2011 ! And another 4-5 months in 2010. It looks like LG# have the same problem - wrong rolling dates. PS Why is it so hard to keep accurate rolling dates for continuous contracts?
Stan S -DTN Guru- Posts: 256 Joined: Apr 13, 2006	Posted: Apr 6, 2011 08:07 AM Msg. 3 of 5 Hi Mvvcorp, Our Market Integrity dept is checking the data & contracts. I will let you know what they find out. Stan S What we do today, determines how people remember us forever. Be the positive force in someone life.
Stan S -DTN Guru- Posts: 256 Joined: Apr 13, 2006	Posted: Apr 7, 2011 07:47 AM Msg. 4 of 5 Good Morning Mvvcorp. This should be fixed over the weekend. We’re going to eliminate all other contract months from charting except H/M/U/Z. This will help the chart look a lot smoother. Stan S What we do today, determines how people remember us forever. Be the positive force in someone life.
mvvcorp -Interested User- Posts: 24 Joined: Apr 7, 2010	Posted: Apr 7, 2011 07:35 PM Msg. 5 of 5 Thank you Please, let us know when the process will be over.