Join the 80,000 other DTN customers who enjoy the fastest, most reliable data available. There is no better value than DTN!

(Move your cursor to this area to pause scrolling)




"Thank God for your Data Feed as the only Zippers I see are on my pants (LOL), and no more 200 pip spikes to mess up charts." - Comment from Spiro via Email
"For anyone considering using DTN.IQ for a data feed, my experience with the quality of data and the tech support has been very positive." - Comment from Public Forum
"This beats the pants off CQG, I am definitely switching to the ProphetX 3.0!" - Comment from Stephen
"The people at Nirvana have very nice things to say about your company and I can see why! Price and service is a potent combination." - Comment from Ed
"I would just like to say that IQFeed version 4 is running very well and I am very happy with its performance. I would also like to extend a big thanks for the fast and efficient help that I always receive. My questions and concerns are always addressed promptly. Way to go!" - Comment from Josh in CO.
"I am a hedge fund manager here. It’s funny, I have a Bloomberg terminal and a Bridge feed, but I still like having my DTN feed!" - Comment from Feras
"And by the way, have to say this. I love the IQFeed software. It's rock solid and it has a really nice API." - Comment from Thomas via RT Chat
"After all the anxiety I had with my previous data provider it is a relief not to have to worry about data speed and integrity." - Comment from Eamonn
"You have an excellent feed. Very few spikes for Spot Forex." - Comment from Public Forum Post
"Just a thank you for the very helpful and prompt assistance and services. You provided me with noticeably superior service in my setup compared to a couple of other options I had looked at." - Comment from John
Home  Search  Register  Login  Recent Posts
Information on DTN's Industries:
DTN Oil & Gas | DTN Trading | DTN Agriculture | DTN Weather
Follow DTNMarkets on Twitter
DTN.IQ/IQFeed on Twitter
DTN News and Analysis on Twitter
Viewing User Profile for: bambaleo
About Contact
Joined: Oct 23, 2019 01:24 AM
Last Post: Dec 3, 2019 11:33 AM
Last Visit: Jan 9, 2020 06:08 AM
Website:  
Location:
Occupation:
Interests:
Email: guliaymsk@gmail.com
AIM:
ICQ:
MSN IM:
Yahoo IM:
Post Statistics
bambaleo has contributed to 3 posts out of 21191 total posts (0.01%) in 1,660 days (0.00 posts per day).

20 Most recent posts:
IQFeed Developer Support » Why realtime bars data is not the same as history? Dec 3, 2019 11:33 AM (Total replies: 4)

Thanks for response, but time labelling is not the case.

In your example nothing changes except timestamps.

In my case volume values are completely different:

realtime:
BC,@VX#C,2019-10-22 10:32:00,16.100,16.150,16.090,16.100,14938,964,,

volume=964

history:
42,2019-10-22 10:32:00,16.150,16.100,16.100,16.100,15371,1177,

volume=1177

It doesn't look like LabelAtBeginning issue

IQFeed Developer Support » Why realtime bars data is not the same as history? Dec 3, 2019 07:53 AM (Total replies: 4)

any news?

IQFeed Developer Support » Why realtime bars data is not the same as history? Oct 23, 2019 01:38 AM (Total replies: 4)

Hello,

I've come across strange issue:

I subscribed realtime bars data using BW request via derivatives port and got:

BC,@VX#C,2019-10-22 10:29:00,16.100,16.100,16.100,16.100,13604,8,,
BC,@VX#C,2019-10-22 10:30:00,16.100,16.150,16.100,16.100,13563,3,,
BC,@VX#C,2019-10-22 10:31:00,16.100,16.100,16.100,16.100,13730,16,,
BC,@VX#C,2019-10-22 10:32:00,16.100,16.150,16.090,16.100,14938,964,,
BC,@VX#C,2019-10-22 10:33:00,16.100,16.100,16.100,16.100,15603,637,,
BC,@VX#C,2019-10-22 10:34:00,16.100,16.150,16.100,16.150,16028,338,,
BC,@VX#C,2019-10-22 10:35:00,16.150,16.160,16.140,16.150,16634,577,,


then I requested bars (HIT request) using lookup port

42,2019-10-22 10:29:00,16.150,16.100,16.100,16.150,13607,11,
42,2019-10-22 10:30:00,16.150,16.100,16.100,16.100,13783,3,
42,2019-10-22 10:31:00,16.100,16.100,16.100,16.100,13950,16,
42,2019-10-22 10:32:00,16.150,16.100,16.100,16.100,15371,1177,
42,2019-10-22 10:33:00,16.100,16.100,16.100,16.100,16036,637,
42,2019-10-22 10:34:00,16.150,16.100,16.100,16.150,16461,338,
42,2019-10-22 10:35:00,16.150,16.150,16.150,16.150,17083,593,

Lookup port data has more aggregated ticks in comparison with data from derivatives port.
Also If I request history ticks, I get more records than Level1 ticks.
Why? Is there any way to receive the same data from Level1, Lookup and Derivatives ports?

Regards


Time: Wed May 8, 2024 5:18 AM CFBB v1.2.0 8 ms.
© AderSoftware 2002-2003