Join the 80,000 other DTN customers who enjoy the fastest, most reliable data available. There is no better value than DTN!

(Move your cursor to this area to pause scrolling)




"I used to have *******, but they are way more money for the same thing. I have had no probs with data from DTN since switching over." - Comment from Public Forum Post
"I've never had DTN go out on me since switching. ******* would go down a couple times every month when I was using them." - Comment from Bryce in AL.
"IQ feed is brilliant. The support is mind-bending. What service!" - Comment from Public Forum Post
"I just wanted to let you know how fast and easy I found it to integrate IQFeed into our existing Java code using your JNI client. In my experience, such things almost never go so smoothly - great job!" - Comment from Nate
"There is no doubt that IQFeed is the best data provider. I am very satisfied with your services. And IQFeed is the only one that I would recommend to my friends. Now, most of them are using your product in China." - Comment from Zhezhe
"I cannot believe what a difference it makes trading with ProphetX!" - Comment from Bruce in Los Angeles
"Everything is working amazing now. I'm already impressed with the true-tick feed of IQFeed and it's ability to support my 480 symbol layout." - Comment from Tyler via Email
"IQFeed version 4 is a real screamer compared to anything else I have seen." - Comment from Tom
"Everything is working great with the API. I love it." - Comment from Calvin
"DTN has never given me problems. It is incredibly stable. In fact I've occasionally lost the data feed from Interactive Brokers, but still been able to trade because I'm getting good data from DTN." - Comment from Leighton
Home  Search  Register  Login  Recent Posts
Information on DTN's Industries:
DTN Oil & Gas | DTN Trading | DTN Agriculture | DTN Weather
Follow DTNMarkets on Twitter
DTN.IQ/IQFeed on Twitter
DTN News and Analysis on Twitter
Viewing User Profile for: trader_8317
About Contact
Joined: Sep 29, 2019 03:11 PM
Last Post: Oct 3, 2019 03:46 AM
Last Visit: Oct 3, 2019 03:46 AM
Website:  
Location:
Occupation:
Interests:
AIM:
ICQ:
MSN IM:
Yahoo IM:
Post Statistics
trader_8317 has contributed to 3 posts out of 21196 total posts (0.01%) in 1,695 days (0.00 posts per day).

20 Most recent posts:
IQFeed Developer Support » HTT Trade Aggressor Oct 3, 2019 03:46 AM (Total replies: 5)

Hi Gary,

I've just re-run it, and I can confirm that it's now working correctly (with 0 in the TradeAggressor field). Weird that it gave that result before.

Cheers!

IQFeed Developer Support » HTT Trade Aggressor Oct 2, 2019 03:35 AM (Total replies: 5)

Hi Gary,

Thanks for getting back to me. Please comment on this thread when the issue is resolved.

Also, thanks for the extra detail around data availability - that's useful to know.

IQFeed Developer Support » HTT Trade Aggressor Sep 29, 2019 03:18 PM (Total replies: 5)

Hi,

I'm trying to execute a HTT request, as per the example on: http://www.iqfeed.net/dev/api/docs/HistoricalviaTCPIP.cfm. I find that when I execute: "HTT,GOOGL,20190409 000000,20190409 235959,10,155959,160004,1,TESTREQUEST"
I get:
TESTREQUEST,2019-04-09 16:00:00.391602,1203.6000,100,948999,1203.2900,1203.3900,10031,E,5,17,48,9,
TESTREQUEST,2019-04-09 16:00:00.391610,1203.7100,200,949199,1203.2900,1203.3900,10032,E,5,17,48,9,
TESTREQUEST,2019-04-09 16:00:00.391615,1203.7700,50,949249,1203.2900,1203.3900,10033,O,5,8717,48,9,
TESTREQUEST,2019-04-09 16:00:00.479088,1202.6900,118,949367,1203.2900,1203.3900,5885,E,19,17,48,9,
TESTREQUEST,2019-04-09 16:00:00.701530,1203.2900,1,949368,1203.2900,1203.3900,10034,O,5,8717,48,9,
TESTREQUEST,2019-04-09 16:00:01.215912,1202.6900,41,949409,1203.2900,1203.3900,5886,O,19,8717,48,9,
TESTREQUEST,2019-04-09 16:00:01.215982,1202.6900,6,949415,1203.2900,1203.3900,5887,O,19,8717,48,9,
TESTREQUEST,2019-04-09 16:00:01.227863,1202.6900,14,949429,1203.2900,1203.3900,5888,O,19,8717,48,9,
TESTREQUEST,2019-04-09 16:00:01.259771,1202.6900,39,949468,1203.2900,1203.3900,5889,O,19,8717,48,9,
TESTREQUEST,2019-04-09 16:00:02.630410,1203.2900,100,949568,1203.2900,1203.7100,10035,E,5,17,48,9,

This almost lines up with the example response given at the bottom of the link I gave, apart from the penultimate column (which I understand should be trade aggressor, with values 0-3) is 48. I've (at least tried to) set the protocol to 6.1. Could anyone shine any light on why my trade aggressor field appears to have an invalid value?

Thanks for your help in advance.


Time: Sun May 19, 2024 12:00 PM CFBB v1.2.0 9 ms.
© AderSoftware 2002-2003