|
Join the 80,000 other DTN customers who enjoy the fastest, most reliable data available. There is no better value than DTN!
(Move your cursor to this area to pause scrolling)
"I noticed that ******* quotes locked up shortly after the interest rate announcement yesterday while yours stayed stable." - Comment from Ron in Utah
"Everything is working amazing now. I'm already impressed with the true-tick feed of IQFeed and it's ability to support my 480 symbol layout." - Comment from Tyler via Email
"I've never had DTN go out on me since switching. ******* would go down a couple times every month when I was using them." - Comment from Bryce in AL.
"I would just like to say that IQFeed version 4 is running very well and I am very happy with its performance. I would also like to extend a big thanks for the fast and efficient help that I always receive. My questions and concerns are always addressed promptly. Way to go!" - Comment from Josh in CO.
"If you are serious about your trading I would not rely on IB data for serious daytrading. Took me a while to justify the cost of IQ Feed and in the end, it's just a 2 point stop on ES. Better safe than sorry" - Comment from Public Forum
"I am a hedge fund manager here. It’s funny, I have a Bloomberg terminal and a Bridge feed, but I still like having my DTN feed!" - Comment from Feras
"Version 4.0.0.2 has been working well for me and I appreciate that it is now a much tighter client to work with. I feel I can go to press with my own application and rely on a stable platform" - Comment from David in IA.
"I'm very glad I switched to IQFeed. It's working perfectly with no lag, even during fast market conditions." - Comment from Andy via Email
"As a past ******* customer(and not a happy one), IQ Feed by DTN is a much better and cheaper product with great customer support. I have had no problems at all since switching over." - Comment from Public Forum
"Interactive Brokers tick data was inconsistent, so I have switched to using DTN exclusively. It is great to no longer have to worry about my datafeed all day long." - Comment from Philippe
|
|
|
|
| Joined: |
Oct 21, 2014 02:48 PM |
| Last Post: |
Oct 22, 2014 02:11 PM |
| Last Visit: |
Oct 22, 2014 02:11 PM |
| Website: |
|
| Location: |
|
| Occupation: |
|
| Interests: |
|
|
| AIM: |
|
| ICQ: |
|
| MSN IM: |
|
| Yahoo IM: |
|
|
etolson has contributed to 3 posts out of 21190 total posts
(0.01%) in 3,481 days (0.00 posts per day).
20 Most recent posts:
Ok, thanks. I assume no users are really using your VWAP field then, as in my opinion this renders it totally useless. Even if only 1% of trades were "other trades", then your VWAP would always be 1% off.
Yes, I'm seeing little vwap problems here and there. I'm looking at period vwap, and that seems to really highlight the issue. For instance, I'm looking at CWEI today. At 10:30:00, the day's VWAP was 71.9932 and the day's volume was 56,309. At 11:00:00, the day's VWAP was 72.0696 and the day's volume was 62,086. So the period volume from 10:30 to 11:00 was 62,086 - 56,309 = 5,777. If you back out what this implies for the period VWAP from 10:30 to 11:00 you get 72.814 because (71.9932*56,309 + 72.814 * 5,777) / 62,086 = 72.0696. But there's now way the period VWAP from 10:30 to 11:00 was 72.814 because not a single trade done in that period was below 73.
Hello, was this issue ever addressed or is this still a known issue for VWAP?
thx
|
|
Home
Search
Register
Login
Recent Posts