|
Join the 80,000 other DTN customers who enjoy the fastest, most reliable data available. There is no better value than DTN!
(Move your cursor to this area to pause scrolling)
"For anyone considering using DTN.IQ for a data feed, my experience with the quality of data and the tech support has been very positive." - Comment from Public Forum
"Can I get another account from you? I am tired of ******* going down so often" - Comment from George
"Just a quick one to say I'm very impressed so far :) The documentation for developers is excellent and I've quickly managed to get an app written to do historical downloads. The system is very robust and pretty quick considering the extent of data that's available. The support guys have been very helpful too, in combination with the forums it's been plain sailing so far!" - Comment from Adam
"Everything is working amazing now. I'm already impressed with the true-tick feed of IQFeed and it's ability to support my 480 symbol layout." - Comment from Tyler via Email
"If someone needs the best quality data and backfill beyond what their broker provides at a rate that is the best in the industry, I highly recommend IQFeed." - Comment from Josh via Public Forum
"I cannot believe what a difference it makes trading with ProphetX!" - Comment from Bruce in Los Angeles
"The people at Nirvana have very nice things to say about your company and I can see why! Price and service is a potent combination." - Comment from Ed
"DTN feed was the only feed that consistently matched Bloomberg feed for BID/ASK data verification work these past years......DTN feed is a must for my supply & demand based trading using Cumulative Delta" - Comment from Public Forum Post
"If you want customer service that answers the phone, your best bet is IQFeed. I cannot stop praising them or their technical support. They are always there for you, and they are quick. I have used ****** too but the best value is IQFeed." - Comment from Public Forum
"Everything is working great with the API. I love it." - Comment from Calvin
|
|
|
|
Joined: |
Dec 13, 2012 09:24 PM |
Last Post: |
Sep 12, 2013 08:03 AM |
Last Visit: |
Sep 12, 2013 08:25 AM |
Website: |
|
Location: |
New York, NY |
Occupation: |
Trader |
Interests: |
|
Avatar: |
|
|
AIM: |
|
ICQ: |
|
MSN IM: |
|
Yahoo IM: |
|
|
jpm has contributed to 5 posts out of 21117 total posts
(0.02%) in 4,004 days (0.00 posts per day).
20 Most recent posts:
I have a minor suggestion for your consideration of implementation: It would be great if @ES# roll would take into consideration volume traded before rolling to the next month's contract. For example, today IQFeed rolled over to EPZ3, meanwhile EPU3 is more active (based on volume traded).
It would of been great if IQFeed would of checked EPU3's volume before rolling to EPZ3 this morning, as the volume on EPU3 was > than EPZ3 so it shouldn't of rolled, if it was less than EPZ3 then it should of rolled.
IQFeed is an awesome service, keep up the great work :)
Jay, Thanks for the quick response.
In my opinion I believe CQG to be overpriced (for the way I trade). I used it for 15 years when I was trading at work. Now that I am trading for myself I am using DTN. I think that DTN is a great service keep up the good work.
If it is easy to add in more EOD data to the contracts without raising costs then it would make the service even better in my opinion.
I think that a good feature to implement into the IQ Feed service would be to add more historical data for stock market index and commodity futures. Specifically end of day price data going back to the 1930's, for monthly, weekly and annual charts.
CQG, and Bloomberg provide historical data that goes back this far. Why not DTN ?
Todd, it would be best if you folks did this also for energy, softs and index contracts such as the e-mini S&P. It looks like you folks are focusing just on grains for this feature (based on your comment). Other platforms such as CQG roll contracts this way.
Do you know when in 2013 this feature will be available?
Did you folks ever implement this contract roll improvement? it looks like 80% want it to roll based on volume. CQG rolls this way as well it would be great to implement this.
|
|