Join the 80,000 other DTN customers who enjoy the fastest, most reliable data available. There is no better value than DTN!

(Move your cursor to this area to pause scrolling)




"Very impressed with the quality of your feed - ******* is a real donkey in comparison." - Comment from A.C. via Email
"You are much better than lawyers or the phone company because you answer the phone when I call! I just love your customer service." - Comment from Isreal
"IQ feed works very well, does not have all of the normal interruptions I have grown used to on *******" - Comment from Mark
"Awesome response, as usual. It is a sincere and refreshing pleasure to do business with DTN, compared to your competition." - Comment from Ryan
"I would just like to say that IQFeed version 4 is running very well and I am very happy with its performance. I would also like to extend a big thanks for the fast and efficient help that I always receive. My questions and concerns are always addressed promptly. Way to go!" - Comment from Josh in CO.
"There is no doubt that IQFeed is the best data provider. I am very satisfied with your services. And IQFeed is the only one that I would recommend to my friends. Now, most of them are using your product in China." - Comment from Zhezhe
"I was with ******* for 4 years at $230 a month, this is a huge savings for me, GOD BLESS YOU PEOPLE," - Comment from T.S. via Email
"I just wanted to let you know how fast and easy I found it to integrate IQFeed into our existing Java code using your JNI client. In my experience, such things almost never go so smoothly - great job!" - Comment from Nate
"IQFeed version 4 is a real screamer compared to anything else I have seen." - Comment from Tom
"Previously I was using *******. IQFeed is WAY more economical, and for my charting needs is just as good, if not better." - Comment from Public Forum Post
Home  Search  Register  Login  Recent Posts
Information on DTN's Industries:
DTN Oil & Gas | DTN Trading | DTN Agriculture | DTN Weather
Follow DTNMarkets on Twitter
DTN.IQ/IQFeed on Twitter
DTN News and Analysis on Twitter
Viewing User Profile for: bambaleo
About Contact
Joined: Oct 23, 2019 01:24 AM
Last Post: Dec 3, 2019 11:33 AM
Last Visit: Jan 9, 2020 06:08 AM
Website:  
Location:
Occupation:
Interests:
Email: guliaymsk@gmail.com
AIM:
ICQ:
MSN IM:
Yahoo IM:
Post Statistics
bambaleo has contributed to 3 posts out of 19631 total posts (0.02%) in 255 days (0.01 posts per day).

20 Most recent posts:
IQFeed Developer Support » Why realtime bars data is not the same as history? Dec 3, 2019 11:33 AM (Total replies: 4)

Thanks for response, but time labelling is not the case.

In your example nothing changes except timestamps.

In my case volume values are completely different:

realtime:
BC,@VX#C,2019-10-22 10:32:00,16.100,16.150,16.090,16.100,14938,964,,

volume=964

history:
42,2019-10-22 10:32:00,16.150,16.100,16.100,16.100,15371,1177,

volume=1177

It doesn't look like LabelAtBeginning issue

IQFeed Developer Support » Why realtime bars data is not the same as history? Dec 3, 2019 07:53 AM (Total replies: 4)

any news?

IQFeed Developer Support » Why realtime bars data is not the same as history? Oct 23, 2019 01:38 AM (Total replies: 4)

Hello,

I've come across strange issue:

I subscribed realtime bars data using BW request via derivatives port and got:

BC,@VX#C,2019-10-22 10:29:00,16.100,16.100,16.100,16.100,13604,8,,
BC,@VX#C,2019-10-22 10:30:00,16.100,16.150,16.100,16.100,13563,3,,
BC,@VX#C,2019-10-22 10:31:00,16.100,16.100,16.100,16.100,13730,16,,
BC,@VX#C,2019-10-22 10:32:00,16.100,16.150,16.090,16.100,14938,964,,
BC,@VX#C,2019-10-22 10:33:00,16.100,16.100,16.100,16.100,15603,637,,
BC,@VX#C,2019-10-22 10:34:00,16.100,16.150,16.100,16.150,16028,338,,
BC,@VX#C,2019-10-22 10:35:00,16.150,16.160,16.140,16.150,16634,577,,


then I requested bars (HIT request) using lookup port

42,2019-10-22 10:29:00,16.150,16.100,16.100,16.150,13607,11,
42,2019-10-22 10:30:00,16.150,16.100,16.100,16.100,13783,3,
42,2019-10-22 10:31:00,16.100,16.100,16.100,16.100,13950,16,
42,2019-10-22 10:32:00,16.150,16.100,16.100,16.100,15371,1177,
42,2019-10-22 10:33:00,16.100,16.100,16.100,16.100,16036,637,
42,2019-10-22 10:34:00,16.150,16.100,16.100,16.150,16461,338,
42,2019-10-22 10:35:00,16.150,16.150,16.150,16.150,17083,593,

Lookup port data has more aggregated ticks in comparison with data from derivatives port.
Also If I request history ticks, I get more records than Level1 ticks.
Why? Is there any way to receive the same data from Level1, Lookup and Derivatives ports?

Regards


Time: Fri July 3, 2020 8:46 PM CFBB v1.2.0 0 ms.
© AderSoftware 2002-2003