Join the 80,000 other DTN customers who enjoy the fastest, most reliable data available. There is no better value than DTN!

(Move your cursor to this area to pause scrolling)




"Previously I was using *******. IQFeed is WAY more economical, and for my charting needs is just as good, if not better." - Comment from Public Forum Post
"Thank God for your Data Feed as the only Zippers I see are on my pants (LOL), and no more 200 pip spikes to mess up charts." - Comment from Spiro via Email
"I'm very glad I switched to IQFeed. It's working perfectly with no lag, even during fast market conditions." - Comment from Andy via Email
"And by the way, have to say this. I love the IQFeed software. It's rock solid and it has a really nice API." - Comment from Thomas via RT Chat
"Thank you so much - awesome feed, awesome service!" - Comment from Greg via Email
"If someone needs the best quality data and backfill beyond what their broker provides at a rate that is the best in the industry, I highly recommend IQFeed." - Comment from Josh via Public Forum
"It’s so nice to be working with real professionals!" - Comment from Len
"I just wanted to let you know how fast and easy I found it to integrate IQFeed into our existing Java code using your JNI client. In my experience, such things almost never go so smoothly - great job!" - Comment from Nate
"Boy, probably spent a thousand hours trying to get ******* API to work right. And now two hours to have something running with IQFeed. Hmmm, guess I was pretty stupid to fight rather than switch all this time. And have gotten more customer service from you guys already than total from them… in five years." - Comment from Jim
"I've never had DTN go out on me since switching. ******* would go down a couple times every month when I was using them." - Comment from Bryce in AL.
Home  Search  Register  Login  Recent Posts
Information on DTN's Industries:
DTN Oil & Gas | DTN Trading | DTN Agriculture | DTN Weather
Follow DTNMarkets on Twitter
DTN.IQ/IQFeed on Twitter
DTN News and Analysis on Twitter
Viewing User Profile for: bambaleo
About Contact
Joined: Oct 23, 2019 01:24 AM
Last Post: Dec 3, 2019 11:33 AM
Last Visit: Dec 5, 2019 02:44 AM
Website:  
Location:
Occupation:
Interests:
Email: guliaymsk@gmail.com
AIM:
ICQ:
MSN IM:
Yahoo IM:
Post Statistics
bambaleo has contributed to 3 posts out of 19346 total posts (0.02%) in 51 days (0.06 posts per day).

20 Most recent posts:
IQFeed Developer Support » Why realtime bars data is not the same as history? Dec 3, 2019 11:33 AM (Total replies: 4)

Thanks for response, but time labelling is not the case.

In your example nothing changes except timestamps.

In my case volume values are completely different:

realtime:
BC,@VX#C,2019-10-22 10:32:00,16.100,16.150,16.090,16.100,14938,964,,

volume=964

history:
42,2019-10-22 10:32:00,16.150,16.100,16.100,16.100,15371,1177,

volume=1177

It doesn't look like LabelAtBeginning issue

IQFeed Developer Support » Why realtime bars data is not the same as history? Dec 3, 2019 07:53 AM (Total replies: 4)

any news?

IQFeed Developer Support » Why realtime bars data is not the same as history? Oct 23, 2019 01:38 AM (Total replies: 4)

Hello,

I've come across strange issue:

I subscribed realtime bars data using BW request via derivatives port and got:

BC,@VX#C,2019-10-22 10:29:00,16.100,16.100,16.100,16.100,13604,8,,
BC,@VX#C,2019-10-22 10:30:00,16.100,16.150,16.100,16.100,13563,3,,
BC,@VX#C,2019-10-22 10:31:00,16.100,16.100,16.100,16.100,13730,16,,
BC,@VX#C,2019-10-22 10:32:00,16.100,16.150,16.090,16.100,14938,964,,
BC,@VX#C,2019-10-22 10:33:00,16.100,16.100,16.100,16.100,15603,637,,
BC,@VX#C,2019-10-22 10:34:00,16.100,16.150,16.100,16.150,16028,338,,
BC,@VX#C,2019-10-22 10:35:00,16.150,16.160,16.140,16.150,16634,577,,


then I requested bars (HIT request) using lookup port

42,2019-10-22 10:29:00,16.150,16.100,16.100,16.150,13607,11,
42,2019-10-22 10:30:00,16.150,16.100,16.100,16.100,13783,3,
42,2019-10-22 10:31:00,16.100,16.100,16.100,16.100,13950,16,
42,2019-10-22 10:32:00,16.150,16.100,16.100,16.100,15371,1177,
42,2019-10-22 10:33:00,16.100,16.100,16.100,16.100,16036,637,
42,2019-10-22 10:34:00,16.150,16.100,16.100,16.150,16461,338,
42,2019-10-22 10:35:00,16.150,16.150,16.150,16.150,17083,593,

Lookup port data has more aggregated ticks in comparison with data from derivatives port.
Also If I request history ticks, I get more records than Level1 ticks.
Why? Is there any way to receive the same data from Level1, Lookup and Derivatives ports?

Regards


Time: Thu December 12, 2019 3:06 PM CFBB v1.2.0 31 ms.
© AderSoftware 2002-2003