Join the 80,000 other DTN customers who enjoy the fastest, most reliable data available. There is no better value than DTN!

(Move your cursor to this area to pause scrolling)




"DTN has never given me problems. It is incredibly stable. In fact I've occasionally lost the data feed from Interactive Brokers, but still been able to trade because I'm getting good data from DTN." - Comment from Leighton
"Everything is working great with the API. I love it." - Comment from Calvin
"IQ feed works very well, does not have all of the normal interruptions I have grown used to on *******" - Comment from Mark
"I use IQ Feed, Great stuff as far as data analysis information, storage and retrieval is concerned." - Comment from Public Forum
"I "bracket trade" all major news releases and I have not found one lag or glitch with DTN.IQ feed. I am very comfortable with their feed under all typical news conditions (Fed releases, employment numbers, etc)." - Comment from Public Forum
"I am enjoying the feed very much - so superior to the broker provided feed I was previously using." - Comment from George
"I just wanted to let u know that your data feed/service is by far the best!!! Your unfiltered tick data is excellent for reading order flow and none of your competitors delivers this quality of data!" - Comment from Peter via Email
"The service is great, I see a noticeable improvement in my volume profiles over [broker]'s data feed" - Comment from Larry
"Boy, probably spent a thousand hours trying to get ******* API to work right. And now two hours to have something running with IQFeed. Hmmm, guess I was pretty stupid to fight rather than switch all this time. And have gotten more customer service from you guys already than total from them… in five years." - Comment from Jim
"For anyone considering using DTN.IQ for a data feed, my experience with the quality of data and the tech support has been very positive." - Comment from Public Forum
Home  Search  Register  Login  Blogs Recent Posts

Information on Various DTN Products:
DTN IQFeed | DTN ProphetX | DTN Ag | NxCore
Follow DTN_IQFeed on Twitter
DTN.IQ/IQFeed on Twitter
DTN News and Analysis on Twitter
»Forums Index »Product Support »POLLS & SURVEYS »Operating System Support for Future Software Versions?
Author Topic: Operating System Support for Future Software Versions? (12 messages, Page 1 of 1)

Poll:
Support for Win2K and XP is all that is needed:
11 (100%)
Support for Win98 and ME is Critical:
0 (0%)

DTN_Jay_Froscheiser
-VP, Product Operations-
Posts: 1741
Joined: May 3, 2004

DTN IQFeed/DTN.IQ/DTN NxCore


Posted: Aug 23, 2004 02:37 PM          Msg. 1 of 12
lease provide your feedback regarding what OS's we should support in future versions of DTN.IQ (Internet and Satellite) as well as IQFeed.

Because Win2K and XP are so much better with thread and memory handling, we are considering supporting only Win2K + with future versions of our software. This means we would no longer support Win98, ME, or NT4. This would greatly increase performance on Win2K/XP systems, and would reduce the development time required to create enhancements.

Before we make a decision, we want to hear what you have to say!

Jay Froscheiser
DTN Market Access, LLC.

taa_dtn
-DTN Evangelist-
Posts: 114
Joined: May 7, 2004


Posted: Aug 23, 2004 11:31 PM          Msg. 2 of 12
You didn't offer the option, but Linux would be the most useful for me. (In case of "open source confusion," I hasten to add that you don't need to release source code -- executables that run under Linux would be ample.)

But in the context of your original question, I don't need '98, ME or NT4.

jfcantin
-Interested User-
Posts: 20
Joined: May 18, 2004


Posted: Aug 24, 2004 10:17 AM          Msg. 3 of 12
Given the choice I would use Linux above all the other choices for IQFeed.

But as far as the above choices Win2K is all I need.

Thanks,

JF
Edited by jfcantin on Aug 24, 2004 at 10:18 AM

jamesh2
-Interested User-
Posts: 17
Joined: May 25, 2004


Posted: Aug 28, 2004 06:36 AM          Msg. 4 of 12
I would certainly chose Linux if you produced a client for it. At the moment all my software runs on Linux and I run a dedicated machine with a Windows OS, just for the IQFeed client.

radams
-Interested User-
Posts: 5
Joined: Jun 18, 2004


Posted: Aug 30, 2004 07:46 PM          Msg. 5 of 12
I concur: Linux would be my preference.

battelle
-Interested User-
Posts: 8
Joined: Jul 30, 2004


Posted: Sep 1, 2004 07:58 PM          Msg. 6 of 12
Linux would be very beneficial--even if your software was just certified to run under on Linux under the WINE windows emulator (does anyone know if it will?) Since most effective use of the software seems to be using sockets, the COM stuff would not need to be ported.

radams
-Interested User-
Posts: 5
Joined: Jun 18, 2004


Posted: Sep 1, 2004 10:00 PM          Msg. 7 of 12
I've gotten it working under Wine. It involved copying a handful of dlls out of my Windows partition, however. I don't think I got an actual install to work, but did it through copying the executable. It seemed to work without a lot of problems, using a program I had written in Visual Studio to access the data via TCP/IP.

Ultimately, I decided this was too much complexity such that, although I do all my development and run all my servers using Linux, I dedicate one machine running Win 2K to the IQFeed. This is not a happy solution for me, in addition to the fact that I have to reboot my machine anytime I want to do development.

To the DTN developers: don't take Wine as a reason to put Linux development on the backburner. I don't know anyone who considers Wine stable enough for production applications, and it is unknown when this will ever be the case. You should release a native client for Linux. Some folks are zealots for the open source thing, but I would be fine with a binary-only release, and I think many other people would be also.

Edited by radams on Sep 1, 2004 at 10:05 PM

midknight
-DTN Evangelist-
Posts: 165
Joined: Oct 16, 2006


Posted: Jun 30, 2007 01:56 AM          Msg. 8 of 12
I totally agree with radams.

I'm never going to run vista. This means any OS emulation is not a viable alternative because I don't even want to install that bloated hunk of junk on a computer. I will be using a Mac as my next main machine, but would happily run Linux on a separate machine for data services. Native clients for either OS would suit me just dandy.

Kind regards,
MK

Neil Brennan
-Interested User-
Posts: 38
Joined: Apr 13, 2007


Posted: Aug 6, 2007 10:35 AM          Msg. 9 of 12
Java.

LTANIQFEED
-Interested User-
Posts: 1
Joined: Jul 21, 2007


Posted: Aug 6, 2007 10:53 AM          Msg. 10 of 12
I would NOT need any support for OS prior to Win 2K. Could you clarify whether you would eventually support VISTA? I currently don't think it makes sense for me to use it and don't expect that opinion to change for the next year or three, BUT I suspect it is more a question of when not if.

For what I do XP 64 bit and W3K probably makes more sense because I can access more memory and storport IO support.

DTN_Steve_S
-DTN Guru-
Posts: 2029
Joined: Nov 21, 2005


Posted: Aug 6, 2007 02:35 PM          Msg. 11 of 12
This thread (in it's original intent) is essentially defunct (it has served it's original purpose). As you can see, it was originally posted 3 years ago.

IQFeed currently officially supports only versions of windows that Microsoft also supports. This currently means Win2k and forward (including vista). You can find Microsoft's support dates and policies (for all of thier products) at Microsoft's website here: http://support.microsoft.com/gp/lifeselect

With that said, I strongly encourage everyone to continue the discusssion that this thread has evolved to in the sense of "What operating environment would you prefer to use and why?" I simply wanted make sure everyone was aware of the date on this original thread.

Neil Brennan
-Interested User-
Posts: 38
Joined: Apr 13, 2007


Posted: Aug 7, 2007 01:16 AM          Msg. 12 of 12
Thanks, Steve. I had noticed the age of the thread when I re-started it, but as midknight had posted as recently as June, I just couldn't help myself.

I was perfectly serious about the Java comment. We use Interactive Brokers TWS as our trading platform with IQFeed for our data, and can run the TWS software (written entirely in Java) on my Macbook Pro, our Redhat Linux servers, our W2K servers and our XP workstations. The fact that the IQFeed software can only run on our Windoze boxes has severely impacted our flexibility in deployment of Production servers.

Java is ideal for OS-agnostic development and should be at the forefront of any discussion of this kind. We use it for all our server development, and have found it to be reliable, robust and faster (yes, faster!) than almost all alternatives. MS VB and C++ in particular are not enterprise-level tools.
 

 

Time: Mon December 11, 2017 1:23 AM CFBB v1.2.0 16 ms.
© AderSoftware 2002-2003